← Search

Jessica Whitmer

Louisville, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 34W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Whitmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-26 · KY/LOU/WHITMER · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · KY/LOU/Frazier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · KY/LOU/WHITMER · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · KY/LOU/WHITMER · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Jennifer Williams
2026-07-09 · KY/LOU/WHITMER · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · KY/LOU/Frazier · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Ochsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · KY/LOU/Frazier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anjali Ajmani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · KY/LOU/Frazier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Ochsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/WHITMER/FRAZIER · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/WHITMER/FRAZIER · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/WHITMER/FRAZIER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anjali Ajmani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · KY/LOU/WHITMER/FRAZIER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.6% of games
3.0
50%
20W–20L · 49.4% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#3 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer