← Search

Joey Rushing

— year-end
49 matches · 18W–31L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Joey Rushing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Proctor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Proctor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Josh Wisener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-1
L
2026-08-01 · Lamar 40-30 Tri 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Irle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Josh Wisener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Proctor Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · Lamar 40-30 Tri 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Nave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · Lamar 40-30 Tri 40 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Irle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Proctor Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Joiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · Baker 40 - 30 Tri 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Zona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Proctor Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with David Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
35.3%
12W–22L · 45.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 37% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams