← Search

Lara Correia Cherem

Arlington, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 43W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lara Correia Cherem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Team 9 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cambra Donelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6
W
2026-07-10 · Team 9 Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Mattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · Team 9 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaama Pandya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Team 6 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Mattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · Team 7 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaama Pandya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Team 7 Volley Girls · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-06-08 · Team 6 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Bielski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · Team 7 Racquet Science · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin Welsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-02 · Team 9 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Gibian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · Team 7 Racquet Science · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin Welsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-25 · Team 7 Racquet Science · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin Welsh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-17 · Team 6 Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Gibian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 59.9% of games
3.0
55.6%
20W–16L · 52.5% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.7% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert