Emily Chapman
50 matches · 28W–22L · seasons 2025–2027
Captains: add Emily Chapman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history50 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Team 15 Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S
Team 16 Gleneagles/Shores W3.0F
Team 24 Gleneagles/Brown-Hasson W3.5S
Team 26 Gleneagles/Whiddon-Steyn W3.5F
Gleneagles/Anderson W3.0S
Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S
Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0S
Gleneagles/Anderson-Shores W3.0F
Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0F
Gleneagles/Shores-Chapman W3.0T
Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
57.4%
27W–20L · 51.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.