← Search

Dana Rowe

Philadelphia, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 18W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dana Rowe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Nina Liou championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Rackets Up! · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
W
2026-06-21 · Rackets Up! · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Lember
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Rackets Up · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · Rackets Up · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · Rackets Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Datz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · Tap that Grass · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emre Unver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · Rackets Up! · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Silver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · Tap that Grass · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peter Rubincam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-21 · Rackets Up! · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Silver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · Rackets Up! · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Llewellyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · Rackets Up! · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer