← Search

Garth Neilsen

West Valley City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 30W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Garth Neilsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelvin Nilsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelvin Nilsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Eyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Eyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Katsuo Togawa / John Wong
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Boyack championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Lebrecht championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Daniel Leach / Ron Clayton
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Mark Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Gibby Lee / Ray Gordon
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with David Osborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Rod Zimbelman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 61% of games
6.0
80%
12W–3L · 64.7% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer