← Search

Kaitlin Wood

— year-end
72 matches · 44W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kaitlin Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Wood/18/2.5/CWD/BTC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Luttkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · Wood-Luttkus/18/2.5/CWN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Luttkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Meghan Slusher / Molly Quinnett
2026-08-21 · Wood/18/2.5/CWD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Wood/18/5.5/CWD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shelly Boudreau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Wood-Luttkus/18/2.5/CWN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Luttkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Berry-Santos/18/6.5/CWD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenifer Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Luttkus-Wood/18/5.5/CWN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Wood-Luttkus/18/2.5/CWN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Luttkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Thiels/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Mcwilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Thiels/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ashley Paz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Thiels/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqueline Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · Gibson/18/2.5-3-3.5/TWD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meredith Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 54.1% of games
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 48% of games
5.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.2% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert