← Search

Melinda Marchesi

— year-end
29 matches · 20W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Melinda Marchesi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-09-06 · Yards - Erenberg · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alixe Stamatogiannakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Yards - McKillop · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth McKillop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Yards - Cordell · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Aura Bernal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · Yards - Erenberg · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Marie Thornton HOLLIDAY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Yards - McKillop · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheri Goldstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Monica Mcgraw / Joan Kaiser
2026-07-29 · Yards - Cordell · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debra Tewey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Yards - Erenberg · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Debbie Brooks / Karen Hartzell
2026-07-12 · Yards - Erenberg · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Loretta Noonan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Yards - Cordell · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sally Krapf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Duval/Cordell · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Duval/Cordell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth McKillop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
Kathryn Cooke
2026-05-24 · Duval/Cordell · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
80%
12W–3L · 68.4% of games
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer