← Search

Erika Hoppes

Washington, DC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 50W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Erika Hoppes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-06-07 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elissa Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-4
W
2026-05-03 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elissa Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Horowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-3
W
Tammy Berry / Shielito Riodique
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · with Elissa Silverman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Dibben championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-04 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-0
W
2026-03-29 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Krudys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-3
W
2026-03-28 · DC Tennis Club · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-28 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Dibben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Paisner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Krudys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 66.4% of games
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 60.1% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 72% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 75% of the time
#1 Doubles
75%
48 matches
#1 Singles
13%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer