← Search

Amanda MacK

Clyde, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 6W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda MacK to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-15 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trish DeFrain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · PH-Neaton 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Mullally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Selman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Nadia Tremonti
2026-06-16 · PH-Neaton 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Katherine Allison / Rose Wedemeyer
2026-06-04 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Muchortow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Sonya Brown / Sara Nirenberg
2026-05-28 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · PH-Neaton 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Boury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · PH-Whymer 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · PH-Neaton 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Dooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · 1PH-Neaton 55 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Dooley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-11 · 1PH-Neaton 55 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Beth Mullally
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.6% of games
3.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 31.7% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Singles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova