← Search

Sarah Cala

— year-end
49 matches · 26W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Cala to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-08-10 · LCTA18/Spicher-Pearson/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marisa Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · LCTA18/Spicher-Pearson/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mandy Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aimee Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Staci Houser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · LCTA18/Cala/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maribeth Blonchek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · LCTA18/Cala/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elyse Alcorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard Hoffman · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard Hoffman · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · LCTA18/HOFFMAN/BRICKYARD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Looney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-11 · LCTA18/Hoffman-Winch/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Looney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · LCTA18/HOFFMAN/BRICKYARD · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-25 · LCTA18/Hoffman-Winch/Brickyard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 59% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.2% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 68.6% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 25% of the time
#2 Singles
25%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer