← Search

Jessica Gilden

Norfolk, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 13W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jessica Gilden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Currie-McGhee - Smash Sisters · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Kana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · Currie-McGhee - Smash Sisters · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Currie-McGhee - Smash Sisters · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Kana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Moro - Cirque de Sore Legs · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Spiers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Moro - Cirque de Sore Legs · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-6
W
2026-06-30 · Dimaya · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roland Nave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Moro - Cirque de Sore Legs · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Esguerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · Dimaya · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Stukey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-05 · Moro - Cirque de Sore Legs · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Esguerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · Dimaya · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Dimaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Cummings - Simply Smashing · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · Dimaya · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roland Nave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.1% of games
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 36.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#2 Singles
17%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer