← Search

Ruben Pena

— year-end
37 matches · 23W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ruben Pena to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-08-17 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gerald Slone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · KY/LEX/SPARKS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Peter Cassidy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-16 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-12 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Tagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-05 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-31 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nel Tapia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-20 · Lost Forest - The Swindlers · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Rioux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-13 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Tagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-11-03 · Lost Forest - D's · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 52.1% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
16%
6 matches
#3 Singles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal