← Search

Graehm Helen Oliver

Fortson, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 32W–8L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Graehm Helen Oliver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Kelley-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · Kelley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Eliza Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Moseley-CCC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sally Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Pearson-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Pearson-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-4
W
2026-05-14 · Pearson-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clark Ezell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Pearson-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 74.1% of games
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.9% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams