← Search

Montana Chandler

— year-end
44 matches · 33W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Montana Chandler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Callegan/18/6.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gloria Alvarado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Nauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Nauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Nauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Scherp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Scherp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · Smith/18/3.0/MD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacob Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Smith/18/3.0/MD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Antoine Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-29 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mia Scherp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Pereira/18/Div2/WN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Breaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Chandler/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blakley Woolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-26 · Chandler/18/3.0/WN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Breithaupt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.5% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe