← Search

Meghan Murdock

— year-end
9 matches · 7W–2L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meghan Murdock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
W
2026-06-29 · SFT:Spark Pink Ladies:Frey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
L
2026-06-25 · SFT:Spark Pink Ladies:Frey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-28 · SFT:Spark Pink Ladies:Frey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · SFT:Spark Pink Ladies:Frey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Chiasson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Lisa Caldwell / Joan Crotty
2026-05-14 · SFT:Spark Pink Ladies:Frey · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Obrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · SFT:Spark Green:Frey/Sideman · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey Meharg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
W
2025-06-26 · SFT:Spark Green:Frey/Sideman · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carla Eberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-05-22 · SFT:Spark Green:Frey/Sideman · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey Meharg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-05-16 · SFT:Spark:O'Connor:Frey · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Molly Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams3 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 78% of the time
#2 Doubles
78%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova