← Search

Katie Radcliffe

— year-end
60 matches · 39W–21L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Katie Radcliffe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Cole-Court Crashers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Nguyen-Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Cole-Court Crashers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Nguyen-Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Cole-Court Crashers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Nguyen-Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Sokol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Weber-Wise Aces 3.5-Woodlands · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · Woodlands Shadowbend · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · Woodlands Shadowbend · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-14 · Woodlands Shadowbend · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Sokol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-16 · Weber-Wice Aces-Woodlands Parks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · Weber-Wice Aces-Woodlands Parks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 58.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
18%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams