← Search

Breanne Reeves

Dripping Springs, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 9W–8L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Breanne Reeves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Magda Stankov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Magda Stankov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-04 · Smash Sisters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Magda Stankov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-14 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebekah Dutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-10 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Allison Lee / Shannon Jones
2025-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Boyds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Boyds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Boyds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Boyds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Boyds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match
#2 Singles
6%
1 match
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer