← Search

Patrick Hale

— year-end
40 matches · 21W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Patrick Hale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-06 · Istre/18/6.5/CM/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Kohler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Hale/18/7.5/CM/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jack Vanchiere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Hale/18/7.5/CM/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carl Arabie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Sheeley/Holleman/18/3.5/MX/LCRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camila Vallejo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Sheeley/Holleman/18/3.5/MX/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camila Vallejo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Sheeley/Holleman/18/3.5/MX/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisha Privat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Vanchiere/18/4.0/MD/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Herrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · Vanchiere/18/4.0/MD/LCRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camila Vallejo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Vanchiere/18/4.0/MD/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Herrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · Gagneaux/18/3.5/MD/LCRC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Gagneaux/18/3.5/MD/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Gagneaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · Gagneaux/18/6.5/CM/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Gover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.2% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 54.2% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova