← Search

Bryan Jarvis

Caseyville, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 43W–17L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Bryan Jarvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Harris (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Harris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Stirewalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Harris (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Harris (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ian Keillor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Harris (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ian Keillor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-22 · Harris (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-22 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · Harris (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Harris (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Reznack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
75%
36W–12L · 56.8% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams