← Search

Sarah Monti

— year-end
16 matches · 10W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Sarah Monti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-06-04 · Beerman Family / Marcewicz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Desiree Tchipanova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Beerman Family / Marcewicz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Nettles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Beerman Family / Marcewicz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Funk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Beerman Family / Marcewicz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Nettles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Beerman Family / Marcewicz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Desiree Tchipanova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-10 · Beerman - T. Marcewicz · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-17 · Beerman - T. Marcewicz · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-10 · Beerman - T. Marcewicz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-03 · Beerman - T. Marcewicz · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.4% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#1 Singles
25%
4 matches
#2 Singles
25%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams