Sarah Latham
Thornton, CO
77 matches · 68W–9L · seasons 2024–2026
Captains: add Sarah Latham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history77 matches
W
Sarah Fitzgerald / Nivale Lightfoot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Lynn Adams / Brooke Babington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Andrea Flake / Derek Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.4% of games
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 81.2% of games
3.5
100%
10W–0L · 81.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 81.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Singles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
12%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.