← Search

Peter Winants

Leesburg, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 30W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Peter Winants to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Team 4 Crenshaw · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Winants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-08-26 · Team 4 Crenshaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Clarke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-1
L
2026-08-02 · Team 4 Crenshaw · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Winants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · Team 4 Crenshaw · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Winants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Higginbotham - Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Harris Mahedavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Tiong - Team Challengers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Bybel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Higginbotham - Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Serway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Scott Johnson / Ryan Poole
2026-07-02 · Tiong - Team Challengers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Bybel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Higginbotham - Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with STEPHEN STANDING
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · Tiong - Team Challengers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Porturica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Higginbotham - Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Rentsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Tiong - Team Challengers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 63.7% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.2% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 36.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.4% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
7.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova