← Search

Elizabeth Smart

Fishers, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 39W–24L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Smart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Sniadecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Sniadecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Gupta · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Sniadecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
Brooklyn Schiffli
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Lynn Schneider / Charli Norris
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emma Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emel Sener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Moore · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Orman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Gupta · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Sniadecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Debbie Barnes
2026-06-13 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Gupta · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 64.6% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.6% of games
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.2% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46% of games
6.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King