← Search

Kathryn Houlton

— year-end
14 matches · 10W–4L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Houlton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-08-15 · 6.5 Netallica · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeanne Vicknair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · 6.5 Netallica · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · 6.5 Netallica · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mirsa Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · 6.5 Netallica · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Klask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Netallica 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Netallica 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Netallica 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanne Vicknair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Paige Sherwood / Emma Smith
2026-05-16 · Netallica 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · Netallica 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · Netallica · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-08 · Netallica · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Fodor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-07 · Netallica · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanne Vicknair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.2% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 73.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer