← Search

Rachel Cockrell

— year-end
48 matches · 19W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rachel Cockrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
Kelsey Van Slyke / Julie Smith
2026-09-08 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Stephanie Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-30 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tania Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Lundstrum/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacob Sander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · Lundstrum/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikhil Parab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-17 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · Lundstrum/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vincent Chang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-30 · Sander/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misti Lira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Cockrell/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · Sander/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-17 · Sander/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.5% of games
3.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 32% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 22.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer