← Search

Hannah Giles

Clemmons, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
49 matches · 44W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hannah Giles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Thompson-White/18+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Eugenia Gallo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · Yadkin/Thompson-White/18+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Strassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsy Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Yadkin/De Young · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Chong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Yadkin/Montessi-Mcmillen/4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Davis Phanthalack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Yadkin/Montessi-Mcmillen/4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Reilly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · Yadkin/De Young · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Calkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Yadkin/De Young · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 71.1% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.2% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.4% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 74.5% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 76.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova