← Search

Conner Pine

Dallas, TX
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Conner Pine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
2026-06-28 · Kiest/Johnson-Seering M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stone Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Kiest/Johnson-Seering M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stone Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Kiest/Johnson-Seering M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Kiest/Johnson-Seering M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-14 · Kiest/Johnson-Seering M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stone Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-27 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-20 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eoin Treacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-06 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-22 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eoin Treacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-08 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Koshkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-07 · Royal Oaks/Treacy M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fletcher Cordell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 26.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#1 Singles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams