← Search

Gareth Rowlands

Johnson City, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 21W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Gareth Rowlands to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
Donald Lovins / Daniel Bogachek
2026-08-26 · Taylor/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Levin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Taylor/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daryl Addison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
David Dean / Austin Herron
2026-08-10 · Taylor/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ke Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Taylor/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Vollmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Adam Kneisley / Daniel Bogachek
2026-07-30 · Taylor/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Vollmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
John Hoffman / Michael Curry
2026-05-26 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Sam Scheffler
2026-05-03 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Sam Scheffler
2026-04-12 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.9% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 77.9% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#2 Singles
15%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams