← Search

Candice Morciglio

Sicklerville, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 18W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Candice Morciglio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Amy Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · Crouse · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Tiffany Karsenty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Crouse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Klear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · Sets in the City · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-06-07 · NJD/Overserved · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Zeltt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Cabida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Sets in the City · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kalyn Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2026-05-02 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Cabida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · NJD/Overserved · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Zimmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · Sets in the City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Croxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · NJD/Overserved · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.5% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#2 Singles
17%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal