← Search

Emily Bryan

Franklin, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 29W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Bryan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-04-21 · Bailey/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyn Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · Bacon/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-06 · Bacon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candice Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · Bacon/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeline Waud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Bailey/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyn Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-23 · Bacon/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Bacon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-09 · Bacon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-17 · Bailey/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Jane Doe / Emerson Scales
2025-11-11 · Bacon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Wolfson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-04 · Bacon/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Candice Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-03 · Bailey/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-28 · Bacon/Nashville · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 66.5% of games
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 71.4% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 65.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#2 Singles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer