← Search

Laura Kroeger

— year-end
28 matches · 12W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Laura Kroeger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-08-11 · KK & Laura 6.5 40+ · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Mangum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · KK & Laura 6.5 40+ · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anu Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Ray/Morgan 40 Tri · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Chasan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Ray/Morgan 40 Tri · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Ray/Morgan 40 Tri · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · Baugh 40 + 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McDuffa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Amanda Davis / Melissa Hargett
2026-05-14 · Baugh 40 + 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · Baugh 40 + 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephonie McCrory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · Wigginton SP26 40 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaka Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-16 · Wigginton SP26 40 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaka Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-21 · Reeves Tri-level · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tammy Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-16 · Reeves Tri-level · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paula Pounders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
40%
4W–6L · 44% of games
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#1 Singles
32%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova