← Search

Cristhian Nagel

Fresno, CA
4.0D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Cristhian Nagel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-05-30 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jazz Chauhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-24 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Lemus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-15 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Lemus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Contente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Lemus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-06 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Oelbermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-22 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Klimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-13 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Diener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-09 · SIERRA SPORT 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kaitlin Drake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 40% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert