← Search

Becca Staudt

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 25W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Becca Staudt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-03-31 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-10 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Horger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-03 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Horger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-17 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-10 · CTL18/BONILLA/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Brantley Clark / Lisa Bailey
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Lehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Joyner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Horger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Lehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 70.6% of games
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 58.9% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe