← Search

Bridget Purdy

KENNESAW, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 26W–2L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Bridget Purdy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · Marietta CC (Tricia Newton)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-17 · Marietta CC (Tricia Newton)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-18 · Overlook (Shelly Owens)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shelly Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-17 · Overlook (Shelly Owens)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grayson Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-24 · Overlook (Shelly Owens)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Chalker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-17 · Overlook (Shelly Owens)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grayson Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-10 · Overlook (Shelly Owens)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · Marietta CC (Cindy Armata)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · Marietta CC (Cindy Armata)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Chalker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
96%
24W–1L · 62.2% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova