← Search

Maggie Cronin

Lititz, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 46W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Maggie Cronin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Zuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Kauffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Kara Schama championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Schama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennie Barbieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Borza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · Bent Creek - Bilson/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Borza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Kelphy Martinez / Divya Enika
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Adnan Pasic championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Noah Gasparro / Janell Baden
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Cronin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Ryan Tiburtini championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 76.6% of games
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 65.6% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
5.0
100%
7W–0L · 71% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe