← Search

Tyler McDonald

— year-end
19 matches · 7W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tyler McDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-04-28 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Witmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Ryan Brown / Mike Claxton
2026-04-20 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · Indy 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-05 · Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Walpole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Daniel Laborin
2026-02-26 · Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Young Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-12 · Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Jason Davis
2026-01-22 · Indy A18 3.5M PATC Walpole · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-17 · CIN C 7.5M PATC Walpole · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams