← Search

Caleb Pipes

Benton, LA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 30W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Caleb Pipes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Pipes/18/6.5/Combo/Fors · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alex Haggblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-27 · Pipes/18/6.5/Combo/Fors · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Henry Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Hunt/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Pipes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Hunt/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Pipes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
Christy Gonzalez / Ryan Jones
2026-05-07 · Hunt/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Pipes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · Hunt/18/3.0/MXD/BTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Pipes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · Wood-Pipes/18/2.5/M/BTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with John Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Michael Bennett / Kelvin Davidson
2026-03-18 · Thiels/18/3.0/M/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-02-19 · Wood-Pipes/18/2.5/M/BTC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Justin Sain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-12 · Wood-Pipes/18/2.5/M/BTC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-11 · Thiels/18/3.0/M/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig McCloud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
John Walker / Nicholas Phillips
2026-02-04 · Thiels/18/3.0/M/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.4% of games
3.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 35.2% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.5% of games
2.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.2% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe