← Search

Emily Hendrickson

Heber City, UT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 9W–23L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Hendrickson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Wasatch Rec 2.5 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · Wasatch Rec 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Molly Lent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · Wasatch Rec 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Candland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Wasatch High School-Kelly/Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Molly Lent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Leslie Jones
2026-04-27 · Wasatch High School-Kelly/Nielsen · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Wasatch High School-Kelly/Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marti Blotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · Wasatch High School-Kelly/Nielsen · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-09 · Wasatch Rec-Kelly/Nielsen · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · Wasatch Rec-Kelly/Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Candland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-23 · Wasatch Rec-Kelly/Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lorie Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-16 · Wasatch Rec-Kelly/Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-09 · Wasatch Rec-Kelly/Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Candland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
2.5
29%
9W–22L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Singles
19%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer