← Search

Ann Pailthorp

Annapolis, MD
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 52W–23L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ann Pailthorp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Koepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Moore · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicoletta Moskios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · Moore · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Mullennix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Melanie Langston / Elissa Pierson
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Selby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Ann Brown / Stacey Hill
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Selby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Naresha Moore / Melissa Walker
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Laurie Selby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · Coufal · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Akay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Mary Mullennix championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Theresa Rowell / Diane Harris
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Mary Mullennix championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
Aileen Andres / Rachel Treisman
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Mary Mullennix championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Estrada · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Erdely mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Coufal · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marnitta King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 71.1% of games
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 42.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 60.9% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams