← Search

Rebecca Peel

— year-end
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Peel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-04-19 · ROLLING HILLS 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Homen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-1
W
2026-04-18 · ROLLING HILLS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Glew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · ROLLING HILLS 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · ROLLING HILLS 18MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Schnebeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-11 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hernon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-20 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
W
2026-02-08 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Schwerin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Schwerin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-03 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Schwerin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elysia Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
Carol Lee / Ilana Roth
2026-01-27 · ROLLING HILLS 40AW3.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Schwerin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams17 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova