← Search

Hania Czeladko

Arlington, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 12W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hania Czeladko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-07-15 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-09 · WTC:Winchester Blue:Campana · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marika Whaley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
W
2026-06-03 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-20 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · WTC:Winchester Blue:Campana · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-13 · WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
L
2026-03-27 · WAC:Kiss our aces:Suarez/Lisanke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Entov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-02 · WAC:Kiss our aces:Suarez/Lisanke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Entov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.2% of games
3.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 38.8% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer