← Search

Austin Vitaliano

NORTH CHARLESTON, SC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Austin Vitaliano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-03-11 · LCTA18/Jones-Rogers/DannyJones · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-26 · LCTA18/Jones-Rogers/DannyJones · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charn Pitiranggon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-02 · LCTA18/Jones-Rogers/DannyJones · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joel McKellar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Chisholm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zach Herbert-burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
William Warlick / Cody Ashy
2025-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Hauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Marc Spears / David Carter
2025-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
John McCormick / Daniel Lench
2025-03-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Eric Sullivan / Ryan O'Connor
2025-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Musick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 47.9% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 77% of the time
#3 Doubles
77%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer