← Search

Amanda Klein

Durham, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 5W–30L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amanda Klein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-09-14 · JORegan.5.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jan ORegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-08 · MMcCullough-DUR · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-1
L
2026-09-02 · JORegan.5.5C-HR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Helen Youngblood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · MMcCullough-DUR · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-12 · JORegan.5.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Doris Stam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · JWeiser-HR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Jasmine Hemmings / Lindsey Morgan
2026-04-24 · GArriagada-HR · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-22 · JWeiser-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renu Mathias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · JWeiser-HR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · JWeiser-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Fitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-01 · JWeiser-HR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · ETurner-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Michelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.9% of games
3.0
5.6%
1W–17L · 25.9% of games
5.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe