← Search

Kavanaugh Danenberg

— year-end
41 matches · 24W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Kavanaugh Danenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brett Breaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-09-01 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hai Bui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · Bolles/18/Div I M/Tri/Reds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandler Credeur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · Bolles/18/Div I M/Tri/Reds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandler Credeur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Bolles/18/3.0/MX/Reds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Champagne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Bolles/18/3.0/MX/Reds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Parker Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Piccione Team 1/18/3.5/MX/Reds · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabel Marin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-26 · Piccione Team 1/18/3.5/MX/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parker Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · Bolles/18/3.0/MX/Reds · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Parker Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · Piccione Team 1/18/3.5/MX/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parker Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Angers/18 3.0M/YSC/LFT · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandler Credeur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · Angers/18 3.0M/YSC/LFT · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Sonnier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams10 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.9% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.7% of games
3.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams