← Search

Courtney Rice

Tampa, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 19W–10L · seasons 2026–2027

Captains: add Courtney Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Davis Island/Parmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Parmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · HCC Smart Aces/Carroll · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Davitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · HCC Smart Aces/Carroll · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Forehand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · HCC Smart Aces/Carroll · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Forehand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · HCC Smart Aces/Carroll · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenni Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-22 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · HCC / C. Eicholtz · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 68.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams