← Search

Michael Coyle

— year-end
56 matches · 23W–33L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Michael Coyle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Chestnut Nystrom/Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Matthew Keuter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · Chestnut Nystrom/Mercurio · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Zachary Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Chestnut Nystrom/Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Matthew Keuter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-15 · Chestnut Nystrom/Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chris Nystrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · Chestnut Nystrom/Mercurio · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sam Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · CORA Coyle · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · CORA Coyle · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aravind Kothandaraman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · CORA Coyle · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-10 · Chestnut Oaks/Mercurio/Coyle · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenna Coyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · CORA Coyle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Chestnut Oaks/Mercurio/Coyle · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz Wiebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · CORA Mercurio · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams13 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.2% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 47.2% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 37.3% of games
5.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
20%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe