← Search

Jennifer Heidersbach

Moraga, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 19W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Heidersbach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-08-13 · MORAGA CC 40MX7.0B · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Olsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · MORAGA CC 40MX7.0B · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Olsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · MORAGA CC 40MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-29 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · MORAGA CC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · MORAGA CC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Franz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · MORAGA CC 18AW3.5B-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · MORAGA CC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova