← Search

Holly Barth

Mechanicsville, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 12W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Holly Barth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Burkwood-Sweeney - A Sweeney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Burkwood-Sweeney - A Sweeney · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Theockmorton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Theockmorton · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · Burkwood Team Cross/Tunstall · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-16 · Burkwood Team Cross/Tunstall · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Burkwood Team Cross/Tunstall · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-11 · Burkwood Team Cross/Tunstall · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · 23 Burkwood Butterworth 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Barth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · 23 Burkwood Butterworth 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Barth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · 23 Burkwood Butterworth 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Barth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-08-14 · 2 Burkwood - Yorke · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Colgin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.3% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams