← Search

Amy Hager

Austin, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 9W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy Hager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Sarnoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · What's Love Got To Do With It · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Nilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olga Wieczorek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Gentle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · What's Love Got To Do With It · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Wadino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Nilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Lauren Ross
2026-05-15 · What's Love Got To Do With It · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · What's Love Got To Do With It · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-05 · What's Love Got To Do With It · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 37% of the time
#2 Singles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
4 matches
#1 Singles
16%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer